These confused Republicans are the reason for the party losing its way. One can not be partially evil, a little deceptive, or only sometimes, make policy choices at the expense of the citizenry based on an ulterior agenda. Today, there is no such thing as a centrist Republican. The Democratic Party is not the party it was when this term was applicable. We must not perpetuate and embrace Liberal ideological diction which is aimed to distort pre-established definitions. If one side is hot and the other is cold, than the centrist is warm. However, if the cold pole barometer is shifted to -273 C, or zero degrees Kelvin, the center variable will indisputably shift. Today’s Democratic Mantra unambiguously represents the principles of socialism. Therefore, it is both imprudent and illogical to even classify these disingenuous Representatives as Republicans, for they are spineless politicians driven by ulterior motives.

Again the ALCU continues its efforts to push our Country towards idiocy. For one to believe in ACLU liberalism, it is necessary for that person to purposefully dismiss all prior knowledge they have attained through education, prior experience or simple common sense. The stupidity required to avoid racial profiling is unconscionable. It is contrary to human development. Just as a wise shopper, avoids paying the higher price for the same item offered by two different suppliers, intellect needs to guide policy. Allowing the ACLU’s far-left liberal lunacy to govern the standards our Government utilized to protect our National Security is utterly ridiculous. How can anyone justify policies which legally mandate the application of the identical threshold criteria be used to determine whether to search an 87 year old Caucasian grandmother for explosives as Security officers must utilize in order to search a group of Muslim men in their 20’s.who are praying aloud in Arabic as they walk at the same location?

The barbaric idiocy of security protocols absent race, age, gender and National origin are inexcusable. Imagine your boss assigning you the task of choosing a company basketball team, which will defeat a competing Company’s already established team. You are to choose 10 players from a pool of 100 candidates which your employer has provided. If you fail to pick a winning team, your future employment will not be secure and you will no longer be eligible for a scheduled salary increase. Although a severe consequence, it pales in comparison to the potential death and destruction associated with allowing a terrorist into our Country through Airport Security. To fully comply with our Nation’s absurd ACLU driven anti-discrimination doctrine, you are not allowed to consider the age, height, size, overall health, athletic experience, ethnicity or gender of the 10 players you pick for your company’s team. In turn, these requirements force you to disregard all intellectual knowledge you have gathered throughout your life relating to statistical advantage and common sense. Following the far-left, liberal non- discrimination model, you could not choose a healthy, 24 year old, 6’11” male (who started on his College basketball team) over a 56 year old, slightly overweight, diabetic female employee, based on any of the aforementioned criteria. I imagine, you would need to next evaluate and compare some other non-relevant to your goal metric before you could pick one person over the other. Does anyone actually apply such decision making foolishness in the real world?

The far left liberal siege of our Country is the root cause of our current problems. In forcing the nonsensical lending policies of the Community Reinvestment Act on our financial institutions, the dishonest, feel-good policy pushing idiots in Congress, created our current economic turmoil. Next they systematically played on the ignorance of the hoi-polloi to stir up fear, subsequently allowing them to propose an outrageous socialist remedy, which history has proven will bury our economy for decades. Their goal is to create a subservient population which can be manipulated to serve their elitist income redistribution scheme. Regardless of the hype, in 2008, the GNP of the United States surpassed the GNPs of the second, third, fourth and fifth largest Nation economies on the planet combined. The United States did not attain its status pursuing the policies of our stagnant socialist allies. Last year, the German Government did somersaults after leaning that its GNP increased 1% over the last decade. Have we forgotten that in the US, we expect a minimum of 2% a quarter?
Final point, never in the history of mankind has raising taxes on the affluent, increased the total revenue taken in by the Government. Without exception, when the Government lowers tax rates, total revenue receipts increase. This premise is irrefutable. How then can a sane person justify spending a trillion dollars on new programs while at the same time increasing the tax burden?

Come on! It's bad enough the liberal media as well as so many Americans have fallen under the ether for this Manchurian Candidate!

This guy is way too slick to allow a fellow black person, to bring him down.  I'm sorry, but Bill O'Reilly and the other talking heads playing into the story are dead wrong.

 

Jackson’s highly successful 30year business of malevolently blaming society for the moral shortcomings of dirt bag individuals, who abandon their kids, wasn’t an accident.  At one time Jackson worked on CNN as an in studio news person, it is ludicrous to think for even a second that the live microphone faux pas was an accident.  Look at who’s involved? Obama is as slippery and smooth as they come.  Since he has never authored a bill or gained personally notoriety due to his stance on an issue, his personal character is hard to gauge.  Therefore, we have no choice but to extrapolate our opinions based on the people he has associated with over the last few decades.   His certifiable close relationships with revolutionary ideologue hate mongers like Rev. Wright and William Ayers are irrefutable. Now couple this information, with a guy who is super smooth, eloquent and protected by the liberal media more than any politician in history. Next connect the dots:

Folks, this isn’t rocket science- “Hey Jesse, imagine how great it will be for you once I am in office”, “The great thing is that it will cast me as a rational moderate like Bill Cosby rather than the radical socialist nanny state supporter I really am”

 

It is embarrassingly gullible to even consider that Jackson, history’s premier race baiting profiteer, accidently spoke into a “Hot Mic”… please!  1) He was waiting to appear on the program Fox and Friends. This in itself speaks volumes. It just happened that his fatal slip of the tongue occurred at Fox.  Jackson appears on: CBS, ABC, NBC, CNBC, MSMBC, and CNN. Considering these venues, he appears on Fox the least.

2) Pulling the charade off on Fox Network was the ultimate con. Where else would it have been reported? Considered reliable? Even have become a story? You must give it to the Obama campaign-they’re good 3) When you speak with your buddy about personal stuff, when no one is around or within earshot, do you whisper under your breath, to the side, covering your words as they did in this rehearsed scam?

 

 

 

Prima Volta, Republican, Democrat is not the point. The issue here is a citizen’s right to choose whether or not he wants to learn and or speak a foreign language.  It is entirely unacceptable for a public official and outrageous for a Presidential Candidate to address American citizens in such a condescending manner. His elitist attitude professes to the world that Americans who chose not to learn a foreign language are inferior. He wants to represent the citizens of our Nation, not the members of the Harvard International Debate Team.  No other leader in the world has ever disparaged his citizenry this way. I found it personally advantageous to learn other languages; however, this doesn’t mean that a coal miner in Pennsylvania is ignorant for not sacrificing his family time and income to learn a foreign language. Nor, should he be demeaned or punished financially for his decision as he is now. In New York City, my elected officials took it upon themselves to spend my tax dollars to print student report cards in both English and Spanish, to cater to the City’s large illegal alien population. It is impossible to imagine another Country’s leader ever describing citizens as ignorant who only speak the primary language of their land.

 

 

If one chooses to stay monolingual; it is his or her right to do so. That is of course, until elitist liberal twits like you are able to pass a law against it.  The Liberal's successful campaign of forcing American Tax Payers to bear the expense of printing everything in dual languages is not only racist on its face, but has proven to hold back the progress of our Nation’s Latin population. It pains me to hear arguments from ignorant people who propagate ideas, which they themselves have not taken the time to thoroughly examine.

Self righteous arguments must be put aside and the language question should be decided by the answer of only one question: “For a child in America, initially learning which “ONE” language will provide the greatest opportunity for success?” I am not discounting the value of other languages, but our Country’s verbal currency is English.  It is pitiful to hear nitwits like Obama effectually instruct the public, to disregard the fact that our Constitution, Declaration of Independence, as well as, every other Government and State Charter official document is and has always been penned in the English Language. Liberals feel that rightfully declaring a national language will damage someone. Again, they are sorely mistaken, not doing so has proven to be a waste of money, loss of National Pride and a loss of respect from competing nations of the world.

Including English, I speak 3 languages fluently, but would like to share an interesting tidbit with the moronic liberal element represented in this discussion by Obama supporter, Prima Volta.

Recently, I was discussing business over lunch with a client.  He is a French National and we happened to be in Paris. Do Americans know that French Law prohibits any public business transaction conversations, discussions, promotions or sales speak to be conducted in any language other than Français. Isn’t France one of the countries liberals often pull wisdom from to decide what’s best for us Americans?